Jump to content

Roch: Dylan Bundy - Dominating


weams

Recommended Posts

"It was his best start, but all of his starts have been really good," said Baysox manager Gary Kendall, whose team is off today before beginning a seven-game homestand. "He's had good stuff and the results haven't gone with it. His other outings have been very good and it may have been a two-out cheap hit after a walk that cost him a run or something like that and it messed up his line. But each outing, he's gotten better.

"Yesterday, he had dominating-type stuff. I only had him one year in 2012 and in those innings back then he'd throw a curveball but there wasn't a slider. Yesterday, his slider was superb. I mean, above-average. He located his fastball to both sides of the plate and his angle was good, it was down. Just a really clean delivery. You just knew the difference from when it left his hand and it was really nice to sit back and watch."

Because there's always going to be an obsession over Bundy's velocity, I fed into it by asking whether he still topped out at 94 mph.

"He was in that range," Kendall said. "The gun readings in Erie were really off, but the range yesterday was 90-94. He's sitting at 92-93. But the way he stayed over the ball and the angle of it, he looked better. Just cleaner."

Bundy, who underwent ligament-reconstructive surgery on his right elbow in 2013, will be restricted to three innings and around 60 pitches for one more start.

"Then we're going to increase it to four and hopefully by the end of the year build up to a five-inning plateau," Kendall said.

Gary Kendall

Bundy struck out five batters in three perfect innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They were AA hitters. Dominating there is not dominating in the majors. A little more gittyup might help.

And it might not be needed.

It isn't like there isn't a large list of guys dominating with a sitting FB of 92-93.

Part of what made him such a good prospect that was he didn't just have velocity.

My guess is the velocity will tick up a bit once he becomes satisfied with the command.

I don't see him sitting at 96, if that type of velocity was still there I think we would have seen it by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were AA hitters. Dominating there is not dominating in the majors. A little more giddyup might help.

I don't think you need to throw 95mph plus to dominate at the MLB level. Granted, when he was in Salisbury he sat between 95-98.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is more to having great stuff than velocity on the fastball. Yes, I'd prefer Bundy to be throwing a bit harder, but movement, command of several pitches, deception and the like are as important if not moreso.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is more to having great stuff than velocity on the fastball. Yes, I'd prefer Bundy to be throwing a bit harder, but movement, command of several pitches, deception and the like are as important if not moreso.

Right on. Gausman is a perfect example, he throws several mph faster than Bundy but when he throws in the middle of the plate he gets hammered big time. It's mostly about location, movement and changing speeds at the major league level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ubaldo is sitting at 88, He's getting plenty of guys out with movement.

Ubaldo is NOT sitting at 88.

Brooks Baseball

In 2015, he has relied primarily on his Sinker (91mph), also mixing in a Splitter (84mph), Slider (82mph) and Fourseam Fastball (91mph). He also rarely throws a Curve (76mph).

http://www.brooksbaseball.net/velo.php?player=434622&b_hand=-1&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=month&minmax=ci&var=mph&s_type=2&endDate=04/30/2015&startDate=04/01/2015

Month

Release Speed in MPH (from 55ft)

Ubaldo Jimenez (Baltimore Orioles)

Sorted by Pitch Type | From 04/01/2015 to 04/30/2015 | All Competition LevelsError Bars: 95% Confidence Interval

Fourseam

Sinker

Slider

Curveball

Splitter

4/15

70

75

80

85

90

95

BrooksBaseball.net | Powered by Pitch Info

Month Fourseam Sinker Slider Curve Split

4/15 91.08 90.56 82.39 75.85 83.64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok. I don't have a speed gun, but I know Ubaldo isn't throwing 94 anymore.Hes closer to 90-88 than 94…Besides, the comment is more about movement than velocity.

Ok. 88 is a bit different though. It is absolutely the movement. But it is firm if not overpowering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

95-97 is better then 92-93. I see a lot of guys on this thread excited about dominating AA hitters. It's easier to dominate major league hitters if you can throw 95+

I agree with you. Velocity may not be as important as other things, but I'd rather see him throwing mid 90s than low 90s. I hope to see him consistently at 94-95 with the ability to crank it up to 97-98 when he needs to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • This guy pitched three no-hit innings against the O's back in April.
    • O'Hearn blatantly disregards the need to run up the starter's pitch count and lines a base hit on the first pitch.
    • I absolutely would not pay a price that includes Mayo and Basallo. Where are the instances recently as it relates to trades where a team gave up two top 15ish position player prospects for any pitcher? I bet they are very rare, and even less rare with pitcher injury rates being what they are. I get that the Tigers can play hard ball and don't "have" to trade Skubal. But I also know that is a risk for them in that he could get hurt and then have no trade value between no and next deadline. IMO the Tigers are not going anywhere with or without Skubal for the next few seasons. They simply don't have the position player talent/offense to be a serious contender. And there best prospects (while admittedly very good) are all in single A. That's why I don't think that Kjerstad holds much appeal for them. Because he doesn't really match their competitive timeline. I don't think any team would pay that kind of price for Skubal. IMO only the Phillies are in a position to offer that sort of package. Maybe Seattle? But neither of those teams need pitching. The Phillies are absolutely loaded as is in the pitching department. And Seattle does have enough offense to seriously challenge. Having said all that, I would certainly seriously consider surrendering one of Mayo/Basallo. But it would have to be in a type of deal like this where I get back a difference making starter who is cost controlled for more than one year. And yes to McDermott (absolutely). Now DeLeon is interesting in that he may have some serious upside. But if you believe in your International/Dominican academy/program, then you have to trust that you can find/farm more young/high upside arms like him.
    • Santander gets his first Coliseum homer in his last game there, wrapping one around the foul pole.  
    • I started yesterdays and that didn’t go well.  
    • Nobody’s started this?     For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Adley Rutschman C Anthony Santander RF Ryan O’Hearn 1B Jordan Westburg 2B Heston Kjerstad LF Ryan Mountcastle DH Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Grayson Rodriguez RHP For the Athletics JJ Bleday CF Miguel Andujar LF Brent Rooker DH Tyler Soderstrom 1B Shea Langeliers C Zack Gelof 2B Lawrence Butler RF Brett Harris 3B Max Schuemann SS Mitch Spence RHP
    • I think those two would be fine in order to get us through the regular season. My concern recently is at least one time through the rotation the last 4 times, we have had at least one blow up start thus taxing our bullpen. Those two would be fine in order to provide a much higher floor than some of our last three starters. However, I don't really think either does that much for us when the leaves change and the calender turns to October. If we are in an elimination game and either is on the mound against one of Seattle's starters, I think they would have the advantage. (Not that Seattle is a shoo-in for the playoffs.) But Philly and the Dodgers are most likely to get to the Series (which of course is no guarantee). And if we were to face either one, I don't like our chances against their top 3 with Fedde and/or Severino on the mound. Plus, I think we need protection at the top of the rotation in the instance that Burnes is to leave after this season. I'm not sure Grayson plus the rest of the non-Burnes guys that we have is even a rotation that qualifies for a playoff birth let alone wins a World Series. A lot of posters are clinging to our the stat that points to our team ERA being 5th in MLB. But if you like at how much it spiked in June and how high it is so far in July, it is clear that it is really going in the wrong direction.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...